I have an SEO plan and want the approved changes completed
SEO implementation carries out the approved website changes from a completed audit.
Put an approved SEO audit into action by making the agreed website changes. An audit names what is wrong and what to change. This is the pass that carries those changes out on the website you already have. Bring the audit from anywhere, including one another company wrote. There is no starting price, because the price is the work your audit named, quoted from it in writing before anything is touched.
An audit from another company is fine. It is read, checked against the site as it is today, and anything in it that no longer applies is said out loud before it is quoted.
It is implementation, not diagnosis. An audit says what is wrong. This makes the agreed changes on the website you already have, inside whatever your platform and your access allow.
Every change is named in writing before anything is touched, and evidenced afterwards. Bring an audit from anywhere, including one somebody else wrote.
When it is a different serviceAny of these is a different piece of work. You get told which, and sent there, rather than quoted for the wrong thing.
| What is happening | Where it goes |
|---|---|
| Nobody has diagnosed why the website is hard to find | SEO and local Google Search |
| You do not know which searches or pages are worth the effort | Keyword research and page map |
| Pages need new writing, or a substantial rewrite | Copywriting |
| The structure, layout or platform itself needs rebuilding | Web design |
| The website, domain or hosting is broken, locked or unreachable | Tech Help |
| You want the measurement set up and nothing repaired. Search Console and Analytics are included here when they are missing, so this is only a different service when the setup is all you want | Tracking and reports |
If several of these overlap, say so. It can be quoted as one ordered project instead of making you buy several disconnected services.
More on how working together works.
Evidence that the agreed work was done, not another list of recommendations.
What you will not have is a position, an indexing date or a traffic figure. Search engines decide what they crawl, index and display. Crawling means visiting a page to read it. Indexing means storing it so it can be shown. Both are their decision, not a setting anybody here controls.
Every repair below happens only when the proposal names it, the platform exposes the control and the change is factually true of the page.
Existing titles, search descriptions and headings are corrected on the named pages so each page states plainly what it is. Google writes the title link shown in a result and says it may use text other than the title element, so a corrected title is a clearer signal rather than a controlled outcome.
Blocked pages, conflicting canonical addresses and stale sitemap entries are the repairs that most often sit at the top of an audit. Google documents how a page is kept out of results, treats a canonical link as one signal among several when it picks the canonical address, and explains in its sitemap documentation what a sitemap does and does not do. The repairs follow that documentation. They do not override it.
Basic structured data is corrected or added when the platform supports it and the markup matches what a visitor can see on the page. Google says structured data makes a page eligible for a rich result, and eligibility is not the same as appearing.
Markup is never added for something the page does not actually say, and reviews, prices or credentials are never marked up unless they are real and visible.
Short wording changes needed to make an existing page understandable are included when the proposal names them. New pages and substantial rewriting are copywriting, priced separately.
Requesting a crawl asks Google to look again. It does not decide what Google does next.
Repairs are finished on a date you can see. What a search engine does with them afterwards runs on its own schedule.
Google says crawling can take "anywhere from a few days to a few weeks", and that requesting a crawl "does not guarantee that inclusion in search results will happen instantly or even at all".
This is why no date is promised here. What is promised is that the work is done, tested, evidenced, and measurable afterwards.
Delivered for one website, one language, and the pages named in the proposal.
The change record is the deliverable people ask for months later. It is written so your staff, your developer or another provider can read it without a call.
Split in two on purpose. The first list is all I need to quote this and tell you whether it is worth buying. The second only matters once you have said yes.
That is the form below. A few minutes, and it saves a call.
No password is sent by email or text. You stay the owner of every account.
A standard five page implementation is normally delivered within 7 to 10 business days after payment and after all required access, information and decisions have arrived. Your proposal carries the actual window.
Platform restrictions, a third party developer, missing access and late approvals move the delivery date, and the work may return to the next available opening.
The standard project is paid in full before it is scheduled. A larger structural project can use the staged payment schedule named in its proposal. Once the work has been scheduled and started, the payment is not refunded, and what has been completed is yours either way.
The delivery window covers the work. It says nothing about when a search engine revisits the pages, because that is not anyone here to decide.
The website, the domain and every account stay yours. Work is done through an invited role wherever the platform offers one. The change record, the validation evidence and any files created for the project are handed over.
Completion means the named changes were made and tested. It does not mean a search engine has crawled, indexed, displayed or ranked them. Google explains in its guidance on title links that a change is picked up when the page is crawled and processed again, and its Search Essentials set out what it looks for. Neither one is a schedule.
Any error made during implementation is corrected without charge when you report it within 14 days of handover.
New pages, changed decisions, findings the audit did not name, or a platform limitation discovered after approval are new work and may need a new quote. They are documented and priced rather than absorbed quietly.
Some builders and plan levels do not expose the control a repair needs. When that happens the repair is documented as blocked, with what would be required to unblock it. It is not invoiced as completed.
If access, information or approval does not arrive, the project can be closed with the completed work documented. Completed work will not be repeated. Reopening can require a new schedule or a new quote.
Once implementation has been scheduled and started, the payment is not refunded. You get the work completed to that point, with its change record.
The public site and its problems can be reviewed on any builder. Implementation depends on the controls, plan level, ownership and code access available. Those limits are confirmed in writing before any repair is promised.
Search engines decide what they crawl, index and display. This service completes the agreed work, tests it and proves it was done.
Light edits needed for clarity are included when the proposal names them. New or substantially rewritten pages belong in copywriting.
Yes. Send it over. It gets read, the recommendations that are still accurate get separated from the ones that are not, and you get a quote for the ones worth doing. You are not made to buy a second audit to use the one you already paid for.
Then this is the wrong starting point. A diagnosis comes first, in SEO and local Google Search, so the repairs are aimed at a cause rather than a guess.
Yes. The audit is yours and any qualified provider can work from it. Coordination with your existing developer can be included when the proposal names it.
The work gets divided into protecting what already exists, becoming understandable, and becoming more competitive. The urgent phase can be bought first and the rest stays documented for later.
The approved plan is the boundary. Anything discovered along the way is written down and quoted, not silently added.
It is recorded as blocked, with the reason and what would be needed to unblock it, and it is not invoiced as completed.
Google controls when a change is crawled and processed, so the service cannot promise a visibility date. Google explains that timing in its title link guidance.
Yes, and that is separate work. Search Console, analytics and conversion measurement belong in tracking and reports.
Yes, by video and remote access. Implementation needs nobody in the room. In person covers Palm Beach County, Broward County and the Treasure Coast.
You get the pages, the repairs, the price and a delivery window in writing before any work begins.
Tell me the result you want and where I can see the business now. I use that information to identify the most useful service or package and decide whether I can quote it in writing. If one missing detail changes the work or price, I will ask for that detail or suggest a short call.
Derek PackerI will review what you sent and reply within two business days.
You will receive a copy of your inquiry. Look for an email from Derek Packer with the subject Inquiry Received — Here’s Your Copy. If it is not in your inbox, check spam, promotions or other folders. Still missing? Email [email protected].